A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s (2004) DNC Keynote SpeechUnfolding the Elements of Social Liberal Ideology

Authors

  • Asiqur Rahman Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64870/9e4yk125

Abstract

This paper conducts a critical discourse analysis of the linguistic manifestation of social liberal ideology in Barack Obama’s (2004) Democratic National Convention (DNC) Keynote speech. Grounded in Fairclough's (2015) discourse theory, Beitz's (1999) and Shypunov's (2018) frameworks of social liberalism, as well as Martin's (2004) positive discourse analysis, the paper examines how Obama’s speech constructs and promotes the key tenets of social liberalism—specifically individual liberty, social justice, unity, and equality—in contrast to the notions of division and inequality prevalent in the context of the USA in 2004. The study utilizes four tools of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA): social actor analysis, metaphors, personal pronouns, and lexical analysis. Specifically, it analyzes how Obama’s (2004) strategies for representing social actors, his use of metaphors, personal pronouns, and lexical choices reflect and reinforce social liberal ideology. Major findings of this analysis reveal that the core principles of social liberalism (individual liberty and social justice) are evident in Obama’s (2004) strategies for representing social actors, his use of metaphors, personal pronouns, and lexical choices. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of how ideology is linguistically encoded and disseminated in political speeches, revealing the complex linguistic mechanisms through which political leaders articulate and promote specific ideologies. This provides valuable insights for future research on political communication and ideological framing.

References

Bartlett, T. (2017). Positive discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 133–147). Routledge.

Berry, M. F., & Gottheimer, J. (2016). The story behind Obama’s keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Beacon Press.

Beitz, C. R. (1999). Social and cosmopolitan liberalism. International Affairs, 75(3), 515–529. https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/75/3/515/2434569

Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and political communication. In Metaphor and discourse (pp. 97-115). Palgrave Macmillan.

Degani, M. (2015). Framing the Rhetoric of a leader. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137471598

Fairclough, N. (2015). Discourse as social practice. In Language and power (3rd ed.) Routledge.

Frank, D. A., & McPhail, M. L. (2005). Barack Obama’s address to the 2004 Democratic National Convention: Trauma, compromise, consilience, and the (im)possibility of racial reconciliation. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 8(4), 571–593. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/26/article/195609

Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00110

Horváth, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. In Language, literature and culture in a changing transatlantic world. International conference proceedings. pp. 45–56). University of Presov. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4a95ae016f963cef2d3aa60254e82b664240fec6

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction ( 2nd ed.). Sage.

Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change.

https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/29390

Obama, B. H. (2004). Keynote address at the Democratic National Convention. Retrieved September 29, 2024, from http://obamaspeeches.com/002-Keynote-Address-at-the-2004-Democratic-National-Convention-Obama-Speech.htm

Orazi, F. (2023). Social Liberalism and Liberal Socialism: Tensions and Compatibility (p. 59). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41233-2_

Shypunov, H. (2018). Liberal socialism and social liberalism: the principles of correlation. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, (5, Vyd. 2), 125-130.

Simhony, A. (2005). A Liberalism of the Common Good: Some Recent Studies of T. H. Green’s Moral and Political Theory. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00170.x

Seaman, J. W. (1978). L. T. Hobhouse and the Theory of “Social Liberalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 11(4), 777–802. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900046606

Tyler, C. (2007). T.H. Green, advanced liberalism and the reform question 1865–1876. In T.H. Green. Routledge

Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466–485). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE.

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32-70). Routledge.

Published

2025-11-16

Issue

Section

Articles